Below what I concluded from this article:
http://www.elpais .com/articulo/espana/UE/explorara/vias/acercamiento/Cuba/elpepuesp/20101025elpepunac_3/Tes
The EU will explore ways to approach Cuba
Ricardo Martinez De Herrod
25 / 10/2010
I welcome the European Union is exploring the option of closer to the Cuban government, and the same time understand that reconciliation is an effort late last year because of international opinion, as evidenced by the consensus in the UN [1] is to withdraw sanctions imposed on the island. This initiative was unsuccessful due to stiff opposition from the powerful U.S. government. It is well known that the motive for the punishment of the Cuban government, and therefore, the island people is their lack of democracy, but, who discerns what countries cradle of democracy, which are not, and what some are even dangerous for her? The obvious answer is to Hegemony: U.S., EU and other countries that have the pleasure of filling the freezers with strokes money, this product of the alleged "free market".
The position of a State under the formula ...
free markets = democracy
... de facto define the quality of the role that lets you take in the society of nations. The trappings of a democratic government is not concerned, however, to simulate something different, an issue bound to respect the decisions of the crowd, is, however, closely linked to the unconditional acceptance of the rules of buying unrestricted sale, even though they may be harmful to any capitalist nation without the ability to go ahead in the fierce productivism marathon.
According to the note, Catherine Ashton, representing the EU's foreign policy, is advocating for is given the opportunity to Cuba to once again be accepted into the "club." In 1996, the European organization decided to extend the distance until the Cuban regime showed "signs of democratization." The representative's arguments leave no doubt about what it means to these governments democratization, she says that "in recent months, Cuba has freed 42 political prisoners and has adopted economic reforms that open up certain sectors to private activity " .
The authority that respects the rights of the governed should not have a single prisoner of conscience in its jails, as to think differently is not a crime. This is an ideal, pure democracy. But consider the translation of the coverage of collective satisfactions of a public sphere to a private non is more designed to address their faces, an indicator of democratization.
Notes:
- What stubborn stubbornness; I Chimney Sweep: http://deshollinador.wordpress.com/2009/10/24/que-terca-terquedad/
0 comments:
Post a Comment